Skip to main content

We offer multiple pathways for your Technology and Talent solutions to impact national security by matching threats with real-world capabilities.

Work With Us - Open Pathways

Find the Right Path to Working With DIU

Pathways through Commercial Solutions Openings (CSO)

If your company has a proven track record of commercial viability with commercial off-the-shelf products and tech, you’re in a great position to work with us. We actively work with companies both in the U.S. and internationally, across allied countries.

You can submit your technical solutions to posted solicitations under our Commercial Solutions Opening (CSO) process and Other Transaction (OT) authority - a fast, flexible way that allows us to competitively solicit proposals for DoD projects, often awarding within 60-90 days.

Open Solicitations —

Massed Modular Aircraft


Responses Due By

2026-07-23 23:59:59 US/Eastern Time

Area of Interest (AoI) Statement: Massed Modular Aircraft


Problem Statement

The Joint Force's reliance on low-density, high-value "exquisite" (>$30 million) manned and unmanned aircraft is unsustainable against adversaries utilizing layered defenses enabled by increasingly low-cost antiaircraft capabilities. This drives the Joint Force into unacceptable compromises: either operate safely outside a threat zone – negatively impacting mission effectiveness, or maneuver inside a threat engagement zone with increased levels of attrition.


To operate effectively, we must accept this inevitable attrition, and deploy larger numbers of less-expensive unmanned platforms, designing them from the start with the expectation that some will be lost in combat.


Desired Solution

The Joint Force seeks a cost-effective, theater-range, massed, and modular Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) to provide a flexible, operationally-responsive, risk-tolerant option in the air domain. The ability to employ many aircraft at once ensures a persistent overwhelming credible threat despite inevitable attrition. Massed modular aircraft (MMA) are envisioned as in-theater reconfigurable platforms capable of long-range payload delivery. Crucially, MMA must retain the ability to be outfitted with a variety of payloads, including Full Motion Video (FMV) sensors, to execute missions that the MQ-9A performs today.


By deploying large groups of risk-tolerant MMA, the Joint Force can overwhelm enemy defenses even while experiencing numerous MMA losses.

Keeping a constant airborne MMA presence to launch weapons, gather intelligence, perform electronic warfare missions, or relay communications will force an adversary to stay on the defensive. This relentless pressure will exhaust the adversary, forcing them to burn through expensive anti-aircraft missiles and resources faster than they can be replaced.


The following attributes represent an ideal solution, although many of these attributes exist in the trade space.


Primary Attributes Sought

  • Risk Tolerance: Designed for affordable, high-rate manufacture, and minimized total ownership cost
  • Sufficient Munition and Sensor Payload Capacity: Payload capacity of at least 2800 lbs
  • Meaningful Range: Unrefueled combat radius of at least 2300 nautical miles while carrying payload and ability to self-deploy one-way at least 8,000 nautical miles
  • Maximum Interoperability, and Integration: Capable of rapid integration and upgrades via exploitation of the following Modular Open Systems Approach (MOSA) tenets: a) Government Reference Architectures; b) Model Based Systems Engineering; c) formal methods-based software verification

Secondary Attributes Sought

  • Autonomy for Control: a one-to-many operator-to-UAS control ratio
  • Sufficiently Resilient and Integrated Communications: Hybrid SATCOM/mesh network connecting to Department of the Air Force-Battle Network (DAF-BN); execution of local airfield operations (taxi, takeoff, landing, and divert) under highly degraded or denied primary C2/SATCOM conditions
  • Tactically Relevant: At least 200 knots true airspeed; operation from 6,000-foot runway or shorter, semi-improved or prepared
  • Sufficient SWaP-C: Sufficient available size, weight, power (25kW), and cooling (5kW) to host a variety of internal and/or external payloads. Enables rapid payload exchange

Capable of full-scale prototype flight testing within 21 months of award, with a targeted Initial Operating Capability (IOC) in FY2031. IOC for MMA is envisioned as 20 mission-ready aircraft delivered to an operational unit, able to be deployed.


Phase 2 Guidance

Companies selected for Phase 2 should expect to deliver a virtual or in-person pitch, and will receive amplifying information with expanded detail to help inform their Phase 2 pitches. As part of a Phase 2 questionnaire, vendors will be expected to provide their Rough Order of Magnitude breakdown to arrive at their proposed design performance and manufacturability tradeoffs. The company’s Phase 2 pitch shall address the Phase 2 evaluation factors contained in CSO HQ0845-20-S-C001 & HQ0034-20-9-DIU, Amendment 0001.


DoW requires companies without a CAGE code to register in SAM (https://sam.gov/SAM/) if selected for agreement award. The Government recommends that prospective companies begin this process as early as possible.

Eligibility Requirements

Eligibility

This solicitation is open to U.S. and international vendors. Vendors are reminded that in order to utilize an Other Transaction agreement, the requirements of 10 USC 4022 must be satisfied. Specifically, reference 10 USC 4022(d), which requires at least one (1) of the following:


1. There is at least one nontraditional defense contractor or nonprofit research institution participating to a significant extent in the prototype project;

2.  All significant participants in the transaction other than the Federal Government are small businesses (including small businesses participating in a program described under section 9 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638)) or nontraditional defense contractors; or

3.  At least one third of the total cost of the prototype project is to be paid out of funds provided by sources other than the Federal Government.


Awarding Instrument

This solicitation will be awarded in accordance with the Commercial Solutions Opening (CSO) process detailed within HQ0845-20-S-C001, posted to SAM.gov on 13 January 2020, updated 13 March 2026. You can also click “View CSO Procedure” found on this webpage.

Farseer: Quantum Sensing for ISR


Responses Due By

2026-07-10 23:59:59 US/Eastern Time

Problem Statement


The Department of War (DoW) relies on robust Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) capabilities to guarantee situational awareness and maintain operational superiority. Currently, critical Joint Force missions are driven by classical sensors that detect fluctuations in electromagnetic and gravitational fields. Additionally, the invisible backbone of modern ISR is absolute precision timing and synchronization, which enables seamless sensor fusion, secure communications, and coordinated multi-domain effects. However, legacy sensors and timing systems often constrain mission profiles due to limited sensitivity or excessive Size, Weight, and Power (SWaP). This inherent sensitivity-SWaP trade-off fundamentally bottlenecks classical platforms, restricting their operational reach and potential in contested environments.


Quantum sensors and clocks are not beholden to the same fundamental limitations of classical systems, providing a path to simultaneously achieving both high sensitivity and low SWaP. Mature atomic and solid-state platforms are now ready for operational demonstrations across multiple DoW domains, specifically functioning as high-fidelity quantum magnetometers, gravimeters, and precision clocks. The rapid development and integration of these quantum technologies has the potential to unlock critical next-generation ISR capabilities essential for tactical intelligence systems, multi-domain collection & electronic protection, precision targeting, and surface air-and-missile defense. By cutting through extreme noise, clutter, and active electromagnetic contestation, quantum sensors and clocks offer the prospect of enhanced situational awareness, thereby facilitating dominance in highly complex, multi-domain battlefields. 


Desired Solution Attributes


The Farseer program is a multi-phase DoW initiative designed to rapidly transition mature quantum sensor and clock technologies into operational ISR capabilities. The DoW seeks innovative commercial solutions to prototype and demonstrate these advanced, quantum-enabled sensing and timing platforms to address warfighter needs. The program will have mid-course functional demonstrations and conclude with full-scale operational demonstrations tailored to relevant military mission sets. Furthermore, Farseer embraces an agile development approach, integrating iterative design spirals to facilitate seamless, component-level technology insertions throughout the program's lifecycle.


The Farseer program is structured across four (4) primary Lines of Effort (LoE), each focused on critical mission use cases: (i) magnetometers, (ii) gravimeters, (iii) portable clocks, and (iv) component technologies for spiral enhancements to quantum sensing and timing solutions. Each vendor is restricted to one brief per LoE, but may submit separate solution briefs for multiple LoEs. Please ensure any submission brief clearly indicates the specific LoE being applied to.


Compelling sensor and clock solutions should have the following properties:


  • Sensitivity & SWaP: Potential to reach sensitivity & SWaP metrics that unlock capabilities beyond current state-of-the-art for concrete DoW ISR applications.
  • Prototype Readiness: Existing prototypes mature enough for initial testing in operational conditions at a U.S. government facility within three to nine months after contract award.
  • Transition Readiness: Clear path to achieving the above-mentioned sensitivity and SWaP goals within two to three years, as well as ruggedness and hardening requirements appropriate to the targeted DoW application.
  • Open Systems Architecture: Sensor systems and component technologies adhering to sensor open system architecture (SOSA) principles and best practices.

Informative submissions should contain the following information if applicable and available:


  • Dual-use viability in specific commercial markets (see Table 1 for example magnetometer applications).
  • Total operational bandwidth and instantaneous bandwidth of the sensor.
  • Previous lab test or field test results.
  • Previous or ongoing integration efforts on defense or commercial platforms.
  • Proprietary control and tuning software and how it would interface with existing DoW hardware.

LoE 1: Magnetometers


The DoW seeks commercial solutions to prototype magnetometers for strategic ISR needs. Magnetometers detecting signals above 100 Hz are of potential interest, with solutions expected to operate in specific frequency ranges that are relevant to targeted DoW and commercial applications (see Table 1 for example commercial applications).


Table 1 – Dual-Use (Commercial) Applications

Application

Frequency

Sensitivity

Critical Minerals

1 - 100 Hz

100 fT/rtHz - 1 pT/rtHz

Oil & Gas

1 Hz - 1 kHz

10 fT/rtHz - 10 pT/rtHz

Medical Imaging

1 Hz - 1 MHz

1 fT/rtHz - 1 pT/rtHz


LoE 2: Gravimeters


The DoW seeks commercial solutions to prototype scalar absolute gravimeters and single-component gravity gradiometers for warfighter needs suitable for static, low-dynamics (e.g., maritime), or high-dynamics (e.g., airborne) contexts. Representative operational metrics are provided in Tables 2-4 based on potential applications in each context. Submissions should specify expected sensor performance in targeted DoW and commercial applications. Example commercial applications include mineral surveying, oil & gas field monitoring, and detection of sink holes or underground voids.


Table 2 - Static Gravimeter Metrics

Metric

Scalar Gravimeter

Single-Component Gravity Gradiometer

Accuracy

5 µGal(1)

10 E(2)

Sensitivity

20 µGal/√Hz 

250 E/√Hz

Size

≤ 20L

≤ 40L

Weight

≤ 20 kg

≤ 30 kg

Power

≤ 50 W

≤ 70 W

Operating temperature

-10 – 40 °C

-10 – 40 °C

(1) 1 µGal = 1 x 10-8 m s-2

(2) 1 E = 1 x 10-9 s-2



Table 3 - Low-Dynamics Gravimeter Metrics

Metric

Scalar Gravimeter

Single-Component Gravity Gradiometer

Accuracy

50 µGal

10 E

Sensitivity

100 µGal/√Hz 

50 E/√Hz

Size

≤ 15L

≤ 40L

Weight

≤ 20 kg

≤ 25 kg

Power

≤ 30 W

≤ 70 W

Operating temperature

-10 – 40 °C

-10 – 40 °C


Table 4 - High-Dynamics Gravimeter Metrics

Metric

Scalar Gravimeter

Single-Component Gravity Gradiometer

Accuracy

200 µGal

10 E

Sensitivity

400 µGal/√Hz 

20 E/√Hz

Size

≤ 10L

≤ 40L

Weight

≤ 20 kg

≤ 25 kg

Power

≤ 30 W

≤ 70 W

Operating temperature

-10 – 40 °C

-10 – 40 °C



LoE 3: Portable Clocks


The DoW seeks commercial solutions that progress prototyping, manufacturing, integration, and field testing of portable clocks for warfighter needs that achieve the operational metrics given in Table 3. Submissions may propose solutions focused on (a) scaling clock manufacturing, or (b) integration of existing prototypes into new and legacy platforms. Platforms of relevance include Positioning, Navigation and Timing (PNT) capabilities, resilient communications, as well as coherent sensor network applications. For the latter category of submissions, solutions may optionally focus on ruggedization of existing prototypes to military specifications and hardware/software interfaces that enable fusion of portable clock outputs with existing timing infrastructure on DoW platforms. System integration submitters can assume tactical clock RF outputs of 10 MHz, 100 MHz and 1 PPS, with the SWaP metrics indicated in Table 5.


Table 5 - Portable Clock Metrics

Metric

Objective

Frequency instability (ADEV)

< 1 x 10-13/ sqrt(t)

Flicker Floor

< 3 x 10-15

Timing instability (TDEV)

< 0.5 ps @ 100 s

Size

≤ 5L

Weight

≤ 5 kg

Power

≤ 30 W

Operating temperature

10 – 50 °C



LoE 4: Component Technologies


The DoW seeks commercial solutions to reduce the SWaP and improve the manufacturability of the current generation of quantum platforms described in LoEs 1-3 or less mature but relevant quantum sensors for ISR applications such as Rydberg electric field sensors. Maturation of components such as chip-scale lasers, micro-optics, photonic integrated circuits, cryogenics, and vapor cells that are necessary to enable operational utility of quantum sensors and clocks.


Compelling solutions will have one or more of the following characteristics:

  • Clear insertion pathway to quantum sensor or clock technical solutions, which may occur in mid-course development spirals. 
  • Modular and broad applicability to multiple types of quantum platforms.
  • Production that can scale to mature manufacturing/microfabrication processes involving trusted manufacturers/foundries, if they are not already mature.
  • Contributes to quantum supply chain robustness.

Proposal Format and Content


In addition to content detailed in the Commercial Solutions Opening (CSO) process document, vendors are requested to submit proposals in the form of a solution brief (PDF file format preferred) that summarizes the following primary information:

  • The LoE being applied to.
  • Compliance to the characteristics/requirements related to the LoE, as stated above.
  • Applicability, but not necessarily exclusivity, to specific domains, as stated above.
  • Current and target TRLs/MRLs of existing and planned product architectures, including details of existing prototypes indicating prototype and transition readiness.
  • Level of ruggedness in terms of vibration, shock, environmental, and ingress resistance.
  • Differentiable innovation(s) and IP vs. the current industry state-of-the-art.

As applicable, vendors may include an addendum (not counted towards the recommended page/slide limit) to their solution briefs summarizing only the following secondary information:? List of any active contracts with the U.S. and foreign governments/organizations.

  • Business relationships with any quantum system integration partners or OEMs.
  • Identification of any critical subcomponents or commodities that are foreign-sourced, and the supplier and place of origin.
  • Identification of any individual or institutional investors in their company with heritage from, or investments in, adversarial nations listed in 15 CFR 791.4.  

FAQs

Question 1: Are solutions targeting combat casualty care and other medical applications in scope?


Answer 1: Sensors aimed at either bringing existing medical sensing modalities farther forward because of reduced SWaP, or sensors aimed at detecting novel signals relevant to patient health, are of potential interest to DIU, especially as dual-use commercial applications of platforms providing ISR capabilities.



Question 2: It seems plausible that simulation tools would fit within LoE4, however, [an] impression is that this solicitation is mainly focused on hardware. Can you provide feedback regarding whether or not modeling tools are relevant to the solicitation and if so, which LoE is appropriate?


Answer 2: Vendors may use existing COTS, open-source or internally-developed simulation tools as part of a proposed project plan (e.g., in a design phase), but the intention is that all final project deliverables will be rooted in physical hardware. However, if vendors wish to request funding to develop new, proprietary simulation tools (software) for interim phases of their proposed projects, for any of the LoEs, then their need and value should be explicitly described in the solution brief.



Question 3: Is there an expectation of cost-sharing on this program?


Answer 3: Prototype OTAs, of the type awarded by DIU for this solicitation, have a cost-sharing requirement: 33.3% non-federal cost share for any awardee that is not a non-traditional vendor (as defined in DFARS 202.101). However, this requirement is waived for a traditional vendor (e.g., defense prime contractor) if there is significant participation from non-traditional subcontractors as part of their proposed solution. Thus, prospective vendors wishing to respond to this AoI can judge whether a cost-share is applicable based on the above guidelines.



Question 4: Are solution brief contents, company identity, and submitter identity treated as confidential and not disclosed to other offerors or unrelated private employers?


Answer 4: Solution briefs are treated as confidential and not shared among vendors responding to an AoI or other non-governmental third-parties.



Question 5: If two entities have overlapping personnel history but separate proposed IP/technical approaches, is there any specific disclosure DIU wants included in the submission?


Answer 5: In such a scenario, vendors can clarify the overlapping associations if/when discussing their team membership, either as part of Phase 1 solution briefs or during Phase 2 pitches (if invited).

Eligibility Requirements

Information for All Vendors


  • Vendors may submit solution briefs collaboratively or independently. A vendor may submit no more than one brief to each LoE.  
  • Proposed solutions must be at a current minimum TRL of 4, and project periods of performance must be no longer than a maximum of 24 months.
  • Support for unique/extreme domain (land, air, sea, or space) requirements is not initially required, but may be explored with potential DoW mission partners during solution evaluations. Vendors should highlight current or near-term support.
  • Compelling solutions may include architectures, materials and radioisotopes that leverage extensive investment, maturity, and supply chain robustness. In addition, approaches that lend themselves towards ease of manufacturability and sustainment are desired.
  • Vendors are encouraged to incorporate ISR government-owned or open standards to support integration with other sensors, inertial measurement system integration packages, or alternative algorithms. Compatibility with existing standards is desirable.
  • Technical insertion solution briefs may be submitted as a teaming arrangement and/or single integrator for sensor/primes or incorporate technical proposals with interface definitions on these subsystems to allow for insertion of capabilities with solution providers. Compelling tech insertions will show clear on-boarding or enhancement opportunities for the sensor and system integrator solutions.  
  • Vendors that already have or had contracts with DIU may apply.
  • U.S. and international vendors may apply.


Awarding Instrument


This Area of Interest is being released in accordance with the Commercial Solutions Opening [MS1] (CSO) process detailed within HQ0845-20-S-C001(DIU CSO), posted to SAM.gov, as updated on 20 April 2026. The DIU CSO can be found at: https://sam.gov/opp/e36edb27e29a4265ab81e40e92263ad5/view. Any resulting agreement(s) will be awarded under the Other Transactions Authority at 10 U.S.C. 4022. Respondents must therefore be eligible to receive an award under this authority.


Follow-on Production


A prototype OT agreement awarded under this AOI may lead directly to follow-on production contract(s) or transaction(s) available for use by multiple organizations across the Department of War without further competitive procedures, per 10 U.S.C. 4022(f).

Pathways through Challenges or Commercial Acceleration Opportunities

We regularly seek proposals from both U.S.- and internationally-based ventures just like you. Apply through DIU’s Challenges or Commercial Acceleration Opportunities to showcase your potential and get tailored support.

Open Challenges and Commercial Acceleration Opportunities —

DIU Presents: Specular MIST Prize Challenge


Responses Due By

2026-07-22 23:59:59 US/Eastern Time

DIU Presents: Specular MIST Prize Challenge

Overview of the Event

The Defense Innovation Unit (DIU), in collaboration with the Department of the Navy Rapid Capabilities Office (DONRCO) and Naval Information Warfare Center Pacific, seeks to identify innovative, scalable, and cost-effective solutions to address modern maritime training and operational challenges. Traditional acquisition timelines no longer support the urgent needs of our warfighters. To maintain maritime superiority, the Specular MIST Challenge accelerates the prototyping and fielding of transformative technologies that deliver an operational advantage at speed.

A critical component of this modernization effort is the deployment of autonomous and containerized payloads to generate combat power at speed and scale. This initiative focuses on accelerating the development, prototyping, and production of a portfolio of payloads for integration onto manned and autonomous Unmanned Surface Vessels (USVs), providing adaptable, lethal, and decisive advantages in contested maritime environments.

A team of subject matter experts will evaluate applicants across a multi-phase competitive process, down-selecting companies to participate in a live At-Sea Challenge demonstration event.


Problem Statement

Current maritime training frameworks and operational capabilities often rely on rigid, distribution-limited, or cost-prohibitive payloads that lack the flexibility to scale. To enable cost-effective sensing, training emulations, and electronic warfare capabilities across autonomous platforms, the DoD requires modular payloads optimized for Size, Weight, and Power (SWaP) that feature open-system architectures and software-defined capabilities.

Submissions are open across three distinct Lines of Effort (LOEs):


  • LOE 1: Threat Radar Simulators - Develop a fleet of maritime-suitable threat radar simulators to provide dynamic threat target presentations for modern training challenges. Emulators must emit complex S-band signals from a moving vessel, operate remotely, and be marinized to support future integration with autonomous USVs.
  • LOE 2: Active Electronic Attack (EA) - Integrate modern active EA capabilities onboard autonomous USVs to execute autonomous electromagnetic warfare operations. Microwave Radio Frequency (RF) technology must sense, digitize, and react to the environment without operator input, featuring real-time adaptive jamming against multiple simultaneous signals.
  • LOE 3: Passive Electronic Surveillance - Provide remotely operable electronic surveillance capabilities at scale to crewed and uncrewed surface platforms. Must sense and process the RF environment with remote operator input, providing state-of-the-art cybersecurity compatible with the existing Navy landing zone.


Technical Attributes


Solutions for LOE 1 & 2 should be designed with a modular, open-system architecture. A focus should be placed on real-time reprogramming and software-defined RF capabilities to deliver tunable solutions. Submissions must address the following focus areas:

  • Tunable & Scalable: Demonstrate a modular open systems architecture with software-defined radio programming for maximum tunability and rapid technology insertion. Address your plan for solution availability, production capacity, and unit cost for 1, 10, 50, 100, and 300 units, beginning 6 months after Challenge completion.
  • Integration: Address unmanned platform integration design, payload optimization (Size, Weight, and Power), and demonstrate the ability to account for vessel motion (roll, pitch, yaw) to ensure accurate payload pointing.
  • Environmental Conditions: The solution must feature a resilient design addressing maritime conditions, elevated temperatures, and ship vibration while maintaining performance. It must also address power and thermal management to ensure efficient thermal dissipation for high-power components.
  • Command and Control (C2): Detail a common C2 architecture capable of operating the primary payload and co-located systems remotely. For LOEs 1 and 2, The solution must demonstrate the ability to ingest target positioning data and automatically adjust antenna position accordingly. For LOE 3, the solution must be capable of operating with multiple layers of encryption while underway, while supporting data transfer of recorded wideband RF.

Specific Technical Requirements

The following Specifications must be met to have a viable solution.


For LOE 1: Threat Radar Simulators: 

The emulator must meet the following minimum technical specifications:

  • The system must provide an Effective Radiated Power (ERP) of 50 dBW operating at a 10% duty cycle.
  • The radar waveform must support a pulse width ranging from 0.5 to 55 µs, a pulse repetition frequency (PRF) between 50 and 5,000 pps, and utilize both unmodulated pulse and Linear Frequency Modulation (LFM) techniques. 
  • The system must maintain a maximum harmonic level of 15 dBc and deliver a beamwidth capable of providing an instantaneous azimuth coverage of at least 10°, complete with elevation pointing capabilities.

For LOE 2: Active Electronic Attack (EA):

The system must demonstrate the ability to operate effectively in a contested electronic warfare environment. It must simultaneously detect and discern multiple discrete queued signals and provide adaptive jamming suppression in real-time without operator intervention.


For LOE 3: Passive Electronic Surveillance: 

The system must be meet the following minimum technical specifications:

  • The system must feature radio frequency (RF) environmental sensing capabilities that encompass, at a minimum, the VHF and UHF bands. It must include subsystems providing position and timing, and deliver a total instantaneous bandwidth of at least 50 MHz. Additionally, the system architecture must be fully capable of hosting and operating government-provided software.
  • Submissions will be judged by the degree to which they comply with the NSA’s CSfC requirements for data at rest and data in transit, frequency range coverage beyond the minimum specified here, and innovative design decisions leading to cost savings in production or for technological refresh.


Competitive Process & Evaluation Criteria


The challenge is structured into three progressive evaluation phases:


Phase 1: Proposal & Down-Select

-White Paper & Pitch Deck



Phase 2: At-Sea Live Demo

-Live demo at Southern California Event with Direct End-User Testing



Phase 3: Post-Demo Pathway

-Maturation Prizes and potential for Follow-on OTA prototype contract / Procurement


Phase 1: Proposal Evaluation & Down Selection

Initial evaluation of written submissions to select viable commercial technologies for live demonstration. Vendors selected to advance receive up to $250,000 to fund participation.

  • Technical Viability & Alignment: Degree to which the solution meets the Technical Capabilities and individual LOE requirements.
  • Team & Company Viability: Demonstrated capability, current production rates, and corporate expertise to successfully develop, deliver, and sustain the solution.
  • Cost & Scalability: Feasibility of proposed pricing ranges across varying production volumes and lifecycle maintenance.
  • Quality of Proposal: Clear, thorough explanation of how the technology fills current capability gaps and enhances operational effectiveness within the chosen LOE.


Phase 2: At-Sea Challenge Live Demonstration & Pitch Evaluation

Hands-on operational assessment under realistic conditions in Southern California, evaluated by a designated team of DoW end users. Down-selection to Phase 3 yields up to $1,000,000 per selected company and potential for follow-on prototype or production contract. Evaluated on Phase 1 criteria plus:

  • Operational Effectiveness: Proven resilience and performance of the hardware/software when exposed to highly dynamic EM environment and maritime weather conditions.
  • End-User Feedback: Ease of use, learning curve, and direct tactical feedback from operators testing the system. Selected companies must provide training documentation ahead of time to allow at least three operators to complete training prior to the event.
  • Quality of the Pitch: Clear communication of the solution’s value proposition, commercial viability in non-defense markets, and responsiveness to technical or business questions from strategic advisors.

Phase 3: Post-Demonstration Pathway & User-Driven Iteration

High-performing vendors transition into unit-focused field assessments for extended evaluation, training, and rapid fielding. Prizes awarded in Phase 3 scale alongside direct feedback from operational units as they train with and deploy the systems.

  • Rapid Delivery Capability: Ability of the vendor to manufacture and supply substantial numbers of operational systems shortly after completing Phase 2.
  • TTP Impact: Measurable positive impact on unit Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures (TTPs).


Challenge Timeline


Date Milestone

07/08/2026 Challenge Opens / Solicitation Release

07/22/2026 Phase 1 Submission Deadline (White Paper & Pitch Deck)

07/29/2026 Announcement of Invited Phase 2 Down-Select Participants

08/05/2026 Virtual Q&A Session for Selected Participants

09/10/2026 At-Sea Challenge Live Demonstration Event Begins (Southern California)

09/25/2026 At-Sea Challenge Live Demonstration Event Ends

10/23/2026 Prize Challenge Board Deliberations Completed

10/30/2026 Prize Challenge Winners Announced


Benefits of Participating


  • $5,000,000 Total Cash Prize Pool: Funding distributed across phases to incentivize maturation and cover live demonstration participation.
  • Direct Exposure: Operational engagement with leaders across multiple branches of the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD).
  • Follow-On Pathways: High-performing vendors stand eligible for rapid fielding opportunities, including cash prizes under 10 USC 4025, system procurement for extended testing, or Prototype Other Transaction (OT) agreements under 10 USC 4022.

FAQs

FAQs section:

1. What does winning look like? 

a.) A combination of cash prizes as described above and the opportunity of a follow-on government contract. 

2. Where can I submit additional questions not answered in this FAQ? 

a.) Please send your questions via email to prizechallenge@diu.mil and reference ‘Specular MIST Prize Challenge’ in the subject line.

3. I have additional questions and want to talk to someone. 

a.) While the Specular MIST Challenge remains open, no meetings with individuals or specific companies will be held on this topic in order to maintain a fair and competitive process. 

4. Should I submit one proposal or multiple for each LOE?

a.) Submissions can be combined for LOE1 and LOE2 or submitted as separate proposals and a separate submission must be provided for LOE3

5. Who will operate capabilities selected for Phases 2 and 3? 

a.) There will be a training period by companies for DoW operators beginning several days prior to the week of the demonstration events. To the maximum extent possible, military members will operate the capabilities. 

6. Will there be follow on contracts? 

a.) Being designated as a winner of a prize challenge under US Code 4025 makes your solution eligible for follow-on Prototype OTs.

b.) There is no guarantee that any follow-on awards or contracts will be awarded. 

7. What happens at the end of Phase 2?

a.) Companies may be selected to continue to Phase 3 where they will provide capabilities and support to the partner unit over a period of 6-9 months for feedback and iterative product development. Additional prize funding will be awarded if selected for Phase 3. 

8. If I’m already on the Blue UAS List, do I need to compete? 

a.) Yes. 

9. Can I team up with a partner? 

a.) The DoW understands vendors may not address all attributes in this solicitation fully; teaming proposals are welcome. Due to the preference to demonstrate within three months of this solicitation, preference will be given to individual or team solutions with demonstrated performance to date. 

10. Will proprietary solutions be accepted?

a.) While a modicum of integration is always required, solutions that are walled off or require extensive time, labor, and expense to integrate additional third party options will not be considered. 

11. What should I put in my proposal?

a.) The criteria outlined in the AOI should be addressed. Key details should include size, weight, power, cost (SWaP-C), performance, ruggedness (e.g., IP rating), and ease of setup. Vendors should also outline delivery timelines, training plans, and their ability to scale production. 

12. I have a great idea but it’s not called out as needed in this solicitation. Should I submit it?

a.) No. 

13. Will I get feedback on my submission?

a.) Individual feedback will only be provided for submissions selected for Phases 2& 3. 

b.) Industry wide feedback may be provided for common trends for success and failure of submissions selected / non-selected during Phase 1.

14. When do I need to submit to be considered?

a.) Submissions must be received by 22 Jul 26 to be evaluated.

Eligibility Requirements

Eligibility & Security Requirements


Participants must have active clearances and ability to access classified networks


Phase 1: Unclassified Execution

  • Performance and deliverables during Phase 1 will be strictly unclassified.
  • An active Facility Clearance (FCL) is not required to submit a proposal or participate in Phase 1. All development, testing, and evaluation during this phase will be conducted in unclassified environments. 

Phase 2: Classified Integration & Network Access

To be eligible to participate, applicants must:

  • Personnel Clearances (PCL): All contractor personnel performing work requiring access to classified information, networks, or facilities must possess and maintain a final U.S. Government Security Clearance at the SECRET level or higher. Interim clearances are acceptable for initial performance.
  • Network Access: Compliance with all DoW, DISA, and local command policies regarding Secret Internet Protocol Router Network (SIPRNet) or Joint Worldwide Intelligence Communications System (JWICS) access. Access requires appropriate PCL, validated Need-to-Know, and up-to-date Cyber Awareness training.
  • DD Form 254 & Safeguarding: All classified work will be performed in strict accordance with the DD Form 254. If the contractor is required to store classified material at their facility, they must possess a DCSA-approved classified storage capability (Safeguarding) at the SECRET level or higher. Otherwise, all classified work will be performed on-site at a government location.


Submission Requirements

Applications must be fully UNCLASSIFIED and submitted via the official portal at DIU.mil before the deadline. Companies may submit separate, distinct proposals for any combination of LOE 1, LOE 2, and/or LOE 3.

1. White Paper

A comprehensive overview detailing the proposed technology, technical approach, capabilities, and novelty.

  • Format: Maximum of 6 pages, font size 11 or 12, 1-point line spacing, and 1-inch margins.
  • Content: Must explicitly state current Technology Readiness Level (TRL) (TRL 6+ preferred for the sensor package), relevance to the specified LOE, and a Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM) for cost and schedule.
  • Protective Markings: Where appropriate, apply standard restrictive text (e.g., “Do Not Publicly Release – Trade Secret”).

2. Pitch Deck

An administrative and technical pitch outlining the operational solution.

  • Format: Sized 16:9 (1920x1080 pixels), horizontal presentation, PDF format.
  • Length: Maximum of 8 slides total, plus 1 additional slide for each specific LOE you are applying to.


Intellectual Property Considerations:

Applicants retain ownership of existing Intellectual Property (IP) submitted under this Challenge and agree that their submissions are their original work. Applicants are presumed to have sufficient rights to submit the submission. For any submission made to the Challenge, you grant DIU a limited license to use this IP for testing and evaluation for efforts specifically related to the Challenge. DIU will negotiate with individual competitors in the event additional usage, integration, or development is contemplated. 


About the Defense Innovation Unit

The Defense Innovation Unit (DIU) strengthens national security by accelerating the adoption of commercial technology in the Department of War and bolstering our allied and national security innovation bases. DIU partners with organizations across the DoW to rapidly prototype and field dual-use capabilities that solve operational challenges at speed and scale. With offices in Silicon Valley, Boston, Austin, Chicago and Washington, DC, DIU is the Department’s gateway to leading technology companies across the country.


Other Transaction Authority:

This DIU Challenge public announcement is an open call to small businesses and non-traditional defense contractors seeking innovative, commercial technologies proposed to create new DoD solutions or potential new capabilities fulfilling requirements, closing capability gaps, or providing potential technological advancements, technologies fueled by commercial or strategic investment, but also concept demonstrations, pilots, and agile development activities improving commercial technologies, existing Government-owned capabilities, or concepts for broad Defense application(s). As such, the Government reserves the right to award a contract or an Other Transaction agreement for any purpose, to include a prototype or research, under this public announcement. The Federal Government is not responsible for any monies expended by the applicant before award and is under no obligation to pursue such other transactions.


Satisfying Competition Requirements:

This DIU Challenge Open Call Announcement is considered to have potential for further efforts that may be accomplished via FAR-based contracting instruments, Other Transaction Authority (OTA) for Prototype Projects 10 USC 4022 and Research 10 USC 4021, Prizes for advanced technology achievements 10 USC 4025. The public open call announcement made on the DIU website is considered to satisfy the reasonable effort to obtain competition in accordance with 10 USC 4025(b) and 10 USC 4022 (b)(2). Accordingly, FAR-based actions will follow announcement procedures per FAR 5.201(b). DIU reserves the right to cancel, suspend, and/or modify the Challenge, or any part of it, for any reason, at DIU’s sole discretion.